By Daryl Lang

© Richard Prince / Gagosian Gallery
“Takes of Brave Ulysses” by Richard Prince, from the Web site of the Gagosian Gallery. Photographer Patrick Cariou claims this collage illegally uses one of his images.
It was bound to happen eventually: A photographer has filed a
copyright infringement lawsuit against artist
Richard
Prince.
French photographer
Patrick Cariou has
filed a lawsuit over a series of Prince collage paintings that were
displayed recently at the Gagosian Gallery in New York. Cariou
claims Prince’s “Canal Zone” series illegally borrows photographs
from his book
Yes Rasta.
Throughout his career, Prince has used borrowed images in his
artwork. He has occasionally drawn criticism from photographers
whose images he has used without permission, but no photographer
has ever sued him.
Cariou filed a suit in a U.S. federal court in December against
Prince, the
Gagosian
Gallery, gallery owner Lawrence Gagosian and book publisher
Rizzoli, which handled a book
connected to the gallery show.
The suit accuses all parties of copyright infringement and seeks
unspecified damages. It also asks to have the unsold paintings and
books impounded or destroyed, and for the plaintiffs to notify
owners of sold paintings that it is illegal to display the
work.
Cariou and Rizzoli Publications declined to comment for this story.
PDN made several efforts to contact Prince and the Gagosian
Gallery and will update this story if they respond.
Cariou’s book on Rastafarian culture,
Yes Rasta, was
published by
powerHouse
Books in 2000 and includes about 100 black-and-white
photographs. The book was registered with the Copyright Office in
2001, according to the lawsuit. The suit says Cariou spent ten
years living with Rastafarians in the mountains of Jamaica.
The lawsuit says at least 20 of the 22 collages in the Prince
exhibition used Cariou’s photos. Based on a few sample photographs
from the
Yes Rasta book available online and images of
Prince’s work posted on the Gagosian Gallery Web site,
PDN
spotted two examples of a Cariou photo reproduced in a Prince
painting. The Prince works also include images of naked women that
aren't from Cariou's book.
The lawsuit cites an
Interview
magazine article in which Prince discusses creating art based
on a book he picked up about Rastas: “It's a very defined type of
culture that I didn't really know much about. But I loved the look,
and I loved the dreads, so I just started fooling around with this
book, drawing it like I did with the de Kooning paintings.”
Press materials from the Gagosian gallery also say Prince used
images “scanned from originals,” or cut out and pasted onto canvas
with paint.
Cariou says he learned of the infringement after the exhibit opened
in New York and sent a cease-and-desist letter to the gallery on
December 11, 2008. The gallery kept the show open until its
scheduled closing date of December 20.
Should the case go to trial, it could produce another decision on
the subject of fair use, an unsettled area of copyright law.
The Cariou case is similar to a 2003 lawsuit by photographer
Andrea Blanch against artist
Jeff Koons. Koons used a
photograph of a woman’s legs as part of a painted collage, and
Blanch sued Koons for copyright infringement. A federal court
awarded a decision in favor Koons, saying his work is
transformative and fair use. An appeals court affirmed the decision
in 2006. Koons has also lost three infringement lawsuits related to
his art.
Prince’s best known work is his "Cowboy" series: large,
photographic prints of cropped Marlboro cigarette ads that can
fetch millions of dollars at auction. Two photographers,
Sam
Abell and
Jim
Kranz, have accused Prince of using image they shot for
Marlboro, but neither they nor the cigarette maker Philip Morris
has sued Prince.
Source document
The case is Cariou v. Prince et al., in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of New York.
View a PDF of the lawsuit on the PDNPulse blog.
Related stories
-
June
14, 2008: Sam Abell Discusses Richard Prince
-
January 4, 2008: Latest Richard Prince Auction Record: $3.4
Million
-
February 14, 2006: Appeals Court Sides With Jeff Koons In
Infringement Case
-
January 2, 2006: Jeff Koons Fends Off Infringement Claim
-
November 9, 2005: Prince Print Sets Auction Record For
Photography
Photographer Patrick Cariou Sues Richard Prince for Copyright Infringement
Jan 13, 2009
By Daryl Lang

“Takes of Brave Ulysses” by Richard Prince, from the Web site of the Gagosian Gallery. Photographer Patrick Cariou claims this collage illegally uses one of his images.
It was bound to happen eventually: A photographer has filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against artist
Richard Prince.
French photographer
Patrick Cariou has filed a lawsuit over a series of Prince collage paintings that were displayed recently at the Gagosian Gallery in New York. Cariou claims Prince’s “Canal Zone” series illegally borrows photographs from his book
Yes Rasta.
Throughout his career, Prince has used borrowed images in his artwork. He has occasionally drawn criticism from photographers whose images he has used without permission, but no photographer has ever sued him.
Cariou filed a suit in a U.S. federal court in December against Prince, the
Gagosian Gallery, gallery owner Lawrence Gagosian and book publisher
Rizzoli, which handled a book connected to the gallery show.
The suit accuses all parties of copyright infringement and seeks unspecified damages. It also asks to have the unsold paintings and books impounded or destroyed, and for the plaintiffs to notify owners of sold paintings that it is illegal to display the work.
Cariou and Rizzoli Publications declined to comment for this story.
PDN made several efforts to contact Prince and the Gagosian Gallery and will update this story if they respond.
Cariou’s book on Rastafarian culture,
Yes Rasta, was published by
powerHouse Books in 2000 and includes about 100 black-and-white photographs. The book was registered with the Copyright Office in 2001, according to the lawsuit. The suit says Cariou spent ten years living with Rastafarians in the mountains of Jamaica.
The lawsuit says at least 20 of the 22 collages in the Prince exhibition used Cariou’s photos. Based on a few sample photographs from the
Yes Rasta book available online and images of Prince’s work posted on the Gagosian Gallery Web site,
PDN spotted two examples of a Cariou photo reproduced in a Prince painting. The Prince works also include images of naked women that aren't from Cariou's book.
The lawsuit cites an
Interview magazine article in which Prince discusses creating art based on a book he picked up about Rastas: “It's a very defined type of culture that I didn't really know much about. But I loved the look, and I loved the dreads, so I just started fooling around with this book, drawing it like I did with the de Kooning paintings.”
Press materials from the Gagosian gallery also say Prince used images “scanned from originals,” or cut out and pasted onto canvas with paint.
Cariou says he learned of the infringement after the exhibit opened in New York and sent a cease-and-desist letter to the gallery on December 11, 2008. The gallery kept the show open until its scheduled closing date of December 20.
Should the case go to trial, it could produce another decision on the subject of fair use, an unsettled area of copyright law.
The Cariou case is similar to a 2003 lawsuit by photographer
Andrea Blanch against artist
Jeff Koons. Koons used a photograph of a woman’s legs as part of a painted collage, and Blanch sued Koons for copyright infringement. A federal court awarded a decision in favor Koons, saying his work is transformative and fair use. An appeals court affirmed the decision in 2006. Koons has also lost three infringement lawsuits related to his art.
Prince’s best known work is his "Cowboy" series: large, photographic prints of cropped Marlboro cigarette ads that can fetch millions of dollars at auction. Two photographers,
Sam Abell and
Jim Kranz, have accused Prince of using image they shot for Marlboro, but neither they nor the cigarette maker Philip Morris has sued Prince.
Source document
The case is Cariou v. Prince et al., in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
View a PDF of the lawsuit on the PDNPulse blog.
Related stories
-
June 14, 2008: Sam Abell Discusses Richard Prince
-
January 4, 2008: Latest Richard Prince Auction Record: $3.4 Million
-
February 14, 2006: Appeals Court Sides With Jeff Koons In Infringement Case
-
January 2, 2006: Jeff Koons Fends Off Infringement Claim
-
November 9, 2005: Prince Print Sets Auction Record For Photography